A State not interventor they were not permissible for, in this manner, the liberal perspective that proliferated ideas concerning the economy without being submitted to the State was fought with resistance; on the other hand, they also did not admit a marxist perspective, that is, they long for an unfastened National Identity of other economic applications. The National State, especially from 1930, would assume a national identity, to a large extent such project was organized by these intellectuals whom they had looked to answer to the investigation of who would be the Brazilian. The quarrel that provokes a nevrlgico point on this question points with respect to the perspective of that the State is not one ' ' ente' ' that it is on the society with an only governing absolute that decides, but is about a politicosocial set. This authoritarian intellectual of that we speak is next to this State as a organizador of a culture, indicating, for example, which routes the New State would have to take, is the case of Azevedo Amaral, as it points Pcaut, one of these authoritarian thinkers. Azevedo of Amaral that if placed against liberalism revealed with its position a model more similar to the Nazi-fascism, something that if approached with the corporativista perspective of the State. The author affirms us despite although the great authoritarian trend, at this moment, artists as Carlos Drummond de Andrade or Oswald Andrade, exactly inside of the critical State still thus presented its the same. At last, Pcaut presents us as this rationalization of the intellectual question and from the question politics it would not proceed if they were separate; this intellectual who supported the State of Vargas, technical was inside of the politics to think on it as an intellectual employee of the same one. He is undeniable when reading Pcaut (1989), that these intellectuals in convincing way found good reasons to justify its interventions, or best one, the great essential importance of its interventions in the society.