Each other involving changes in the organizational structure and in the apparatus of the mind. As development progresses genetic changes are produced behavior. Thanks to its progress in its ability to rule a certain skill, their adaptation to the environment will be better, becoming more efficient, given what has been called a feedbacka , ie, improving behavior brings experience which reverts to the organizational structure (recursive loop). In the present case, we see this phenomenon reflected in the words of John when he says: al principle could not run like a monkey, but then I Mesia . As a final thought I would say that in the natural environment of human beings there is an eminently social dimension that produces different stimuli and disturbances. The impact of both leads to a considerable diversity of development paths.

The biology will define and develop the capacities of language, movement, etc. to , but the socialization is that triggers the psychic development, the learning of rules, both explicit and implicit behavior, modes mental operation, etc. to Genetically, innate abilities are there, but the use of some or other cultural reasons, the external stimulation of either, will result in the development or inhibition. As Piaget and Vygotsky point: the reality of building the human being in constant and continuous interaction with their environment, although the first address from the internal processes and explain Vygotsky through the mediation of the environment. And also, according to Vygotsky, a the personal humanity depends not only on genes but on the relationship and interaction with more personasa . a One last point, a very interesting discussion of this story is the question of what it means to be human, and if one of us can exist outside the social context. Many writers such as Marlene Dietrich offer more in-depth analysis. And secondly, what would they think those monkeys?